GalatiansStudy 33: Gal. 5:7-12The leaven
We looked in the previous study at 'the race', we now turn to another word Paul uses: leaven. Leaven was used, in Bible days, in bread making, particularly in the fermentation process, so that the bread would rise. This process takes time, and so when the children of Israel remembered the Exodus it was with unleavened bread, in order that they would not forget that is was all done in haste Deut.16:3. Once we get into the NT we see that leaven represents (typifies) a spiritual principle, which Paul now uses in connection to the Galatians' situation. Paul uses this word in another epistle in relation to a particular problem in Corinth. 1. .. of wickedness
In the Corinthian Church there was a man who had fallen into sexual immorality, and Paul was writing in order to apply the required discipline. His judgement was to put away that wicked person from the fellowship. Before proceeding it will be instructive to note that in the second epistle, Paul calls for his restoration after having come to repentance; the point being that discipline is meant to bring restoration to the one who has fallen. II Cor. 2:1-11 Apart from being a tool of restoration for the fallen believer discipline is also for the sake of the fellowship. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Leaven makes the bread to rise and the sin of this person would, if allowed, have spread and infected the whole assembly. Hence the need to cast out the wicked one. We are to keep our passover as the Jews did theirs. This does not mean that we engage in the Jewish ritual of Passover, as some would have us do, but rather apply the spiritual principals that the Jewish feast represents. We are told clearly here that Jesus is our Passover and our keeping it is to do with that fact. When the Jews had the Passover they would search their houses diligently to cast out all the leaven that was in it. So likewise we are to partake of our Passover, that is JESUS, not with the leaven of malice and wickedness. In other words we are not to allow any evil to be part of our life in Christ. We are delivered by new birth from sin, but we are responsible not to introduce any sin back in. And just as the Jews kept their Passover without leaven so we are to keeps ours in sincerity and truth. 2. ... of the Pharisees & Sadducees
Jesus also refers to leaven, but this time in connection with the Pharisees and Sadducees. Reading the above account the conclusion we are brought to is that this leaven is that of doctrine. But what was the doctrine of the Pharisees and Sadducees? The NT leaves us in no doubt as to what these are:
The Pharisees had the reputation for adding to the Mosaic law. Here Jesus says that they were heavy burdens and they were grievous to be borne, laying heavy weights on the shoulders of men and women, yet not helping to move the weights themselves! What a
contrast to Jesus' burden, which is light and easy! Matt.
11:28-29 Later in Galatians Paul also mentions
the fact that these false brethren care nothing for the law and
regulations they seek to impose on people, but rather to glory in those
whom they seek to control, Gal.6:12-13.
If the Pharisees' doctrine was to add to the law and burden people with regulations, the Sadducees subtracted. About the only thing we are told of them in scripture is that they denied angel, spirit and resurrection. They appear to have been the sceptics of the day. Thus we see that the Pharisees' doctrine leads to legalism and that of the Sadducees to unbelief 3. A little leavenSo why does it matter? Surely a 'small' sin won't be harmful to a large congregation, nor a small error in doctrine be that important will it? As to the so called small sin, once allowed a sinful practice will spread, and eventually, if allowed, be accepted as normal. Thus an assembly, instead of being an expression of the beauty and holiness of Her Lord, becomes a defiled temple full of wickedness. The Lord wants a Bride that is holy and without wrinkle, whilst we have no power to cleanse the body we do have the responsibility to see that sin is not allowed in, and apply discipline if necessary. Take for example, Peter's dealings with Ananias and Sapphira Acts.5:1-11But what about doctrine, surely a bit of error here or there is not going to harm anyone, is it? First of all we are talking here, not of peripheral issues but rather the basics, the fundamentals, the essentials of the Faith. and anyway why call it leaven?
Here we have, at least part of the answer. When writing to the Romans Paul says that they had obeyed the form of doctrine that was delivered to them. The teaching they had received had turn into practice, in their case obedience to the truth. Teaching leads to some form of practice. False teaching will lead to false practice. The smallest tendency to err will lead to larger errors in time; as the old Chinese proverb says: a journey of a thousand miles starts with the first step. Let it also be understood that we are here talking of the basics, the fundamentals of the Faith, and not the non essential peripherals about which men seem to endlessly argue, to the detriment of many and benefit of no one. It only
takes a little
leaven to leaven the whole lump. Whether it be sin in
practice or
in doctrine, both will cause the whole lump to be
infected. Once a
small point is conceded then it is only a
matter of
time before the next step, and so on until false doctrine and practice
is rife amongst the believers. Take our previous example of believers
insisting that Christians ought to partake of the Jewish Passover
(despite of what we have said about it above) If believers did so, what
next? The feast of Dedication? Atonement? And then what? Circumcision?
One step leads to another , so let us not take even the smallest of
smallest first steps.
Let us then be single minded and not allow any leaven, whether it be a practice or doctrine to creep in. In Jude's words.
|